An analysis of george orwells two conflicting feelings towards the burmese people

Yet, as he states in "Shooting an Elephant," he could not help but feel a visceral dislike of many of the The essay deals with the hatred that Europeans had earned for themselves while trying to rule the natives by force.

Numerous times it can be seen he puts his personal commentary on some points in the story such as when he described how a dead man does not look peaceful or even the entire sequence when he contemplated on whether to shoot the elephant or not.

Shooting An Elephant

With the second shot he tried to get back on his feet and the third shot brought him down but he seemed to be struggling to remain on his feet till at last he fell.

The Burman crowd behind him, the audience. As an officer he cannot help abiding to the laws and doing his duty but still he shows that the most important part of him would go missing if he continued in the job.

At last left with no alternative, Orwell got down on the road and aimed at the elephant. The more cruelties the imperials perpetrate, the more stubborn the locals grow. Orwell realizes that throughout his entire rule in Burma he is actually the victim of the Burmese, and it is their expectations of what he should do with his power that force him to do what they want.

They can inflict as much cruelty as they like but they have built a hell and it will not add to their pride and only deplete them of their willpower like Orwell feels his depleting to see a crowd of yellow faces on his back.

The incident portrayed in the essay took place in Moulmein, now known as Mawlamyine.

Shooting an Elephant Questions and Answers

The miserable lives of those prisoners inside those stinky and small prison cells and the signs of cruelty on their buttocks, all make him feel deeply for the natives. The townspeople, who were previously uninterested in the destructive elephant, have seen the gun and are excited to see the beast shot.

George Orwell “Shooting An Elephant”: Metaphors and Analysis

The build-up of finding the elephant is a metaphor itself showing the destructive power of imperialism: What made the hatred against him even bitter was his position of a police officer. The scars on the buttocks of these prisoners tell how they were brutally bogged. It shows that this has given birth to a comic situation because the oppressor is harming himself more than he is benefitting from his tyranny.

Orwell demonstrates this perfectly by turning himself, who is supposed to be the higher power, into the victim. Orwell felt a strong sense of guilt and therefore resigned when he was in England on a leave.

In spite of his reasoned introspection, he cannot resist the actions that the role forces him to make in order to display his power. The corpse looked devilish with its eyes wide open and skin off its back. Orwell feels as though he is a magician tasked with entertaining them, and realizes that he is now compelled to shoot the elephant.

He is puppet being controlled.

An analysis of the conflict in the red badge of courage

Orwell waits for it to die, but it continues to breathe. Summary Analysis George Orwell works as the sub-divisional police officer of Moulmein, a town in the British colony of Burma. Because it is both a harmless animal and a valuable piece of property, it is clear that there is no ethical or practical reason to hurt the elephant.

These bullets do nothing; the elephant continues to breathe torturously. It is deeply ironic, and tragic, that Orwell is compelled to entrench himself further in barbarism, simply because he feels that propriety dictates that he do so.

Orwell, the imperialist, cannot do anything other than what the Burmese expect him to do. Orwell uses not one but two rifles to kill the elephant and still it keeps breathing and dies half an hour later than Orwell has poured several bullets into it and left the scene.

Orwell uses other metaphors such as when he compares himself to being a magician about to perform a trick, or as being a lead actor in a piece, and even an absurd puppet, a posing dummy, and to be wearing a mask. And he shows how the influences of Imperialism harm both sides. George Orwell works as the sub-divisional police officer of Moulmein, a town in the British colony of Burma.

An analysis of the effect of gay marriages on children

Because he is, like the rest of the English, a military occupier, he is hated by much of the village. From his introduction, George Orwell seems to have ambivalent feelings about the Burmese. On the one hand, he states that he is theoretically and secretly "all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British and he feels an "intolerable sense of guilt" for the "wretched prisoners.".

Orwell's resentful feelings towards the Burmese are ironic because What irony is expressed in this statement: A sahib has got to act like a sahib; he has got to appear resolute, to know his own mind and do definite things?

Shooting an Elephant presents an account of George Orwell’s, originally Eric Blair, life in Burma where he was posted as a subdivisional police officer of the British. Burma was a major inspiration for Orwell and his works and remained an important influence throughout his literary career.

He also talks about his ambiguous attitude towards the Burmese people who ridicule and mock him because of anti-European feelings and towards the British Empire whose “dirty show more content Shooting an Elephant” is an autobiographically influenced short story written by George Orwell and published in For example he refers to the large crowd of people behind him as “an army of people.” Not only does army make the reader think of a large crowd but to be military-like and force Orwell to change his actions.

George Orwell’s Shooting An Elephant is a great essay combining personal experience and.

Download-Theses An analysis of george orwells two conflicting feelings towards the burmese people
Rated 3/5 based on 36 review
Shooting an Elephant - Wikipedia